Over the past few years, a mounting number of C-arm technologies have begun to embrace the same trend that the business has seen in interventional laboratories, which is a change from traditional image intensifiers to digital flat panel detectors (FPD). With more choices for FPD obtainable, anyone seeing a C-arm purchase from a C-Arm Machine Manufacturers could be confronted with an important decision. Image intensifier or digital flat panel detector? Both technologies have their rewards, from system functionality to device scope.
Dosage
One of the most important differences when it originates to flat panel detectors and image intensifiers is the radioactivity dose.
While the technology driving both kinds of systems has advanced dramatically over the years, with each new repetition intended to decrease the amount of radioactivity the patient and the healthcare team may be unprotected from, there is a limit to what an image intensifier can achieve. The humble fact is that flat panel skill will almost always give you a lower quantity than an image intensifier. You can see this come into play when working with the exaggeration means available on each system. To get down to the Skyrocket 3 background on an image intensifier, you’ll need to surge the dosage by five times as much as you would in the normal full-field mode. The same exaggeration on a flat panel detector, on the other hand, includes an intensification of about half the II upsurge. If keeping the dose low is your main concern, then your choice is an informal one: flat panel technology.
Assistance and Parts
Many establishments opt for the image intensifier due to an inborn knowledge of the system, which demonstrates easier on-site troubleshooting among the in-house team.
Most C-arm operators have years of knowledge working with image intensifiers, so they know the accidents of the systems and can pretty quickly determine what to do if they know of any kind of mistake. It’s also fairly easy to find parts when a slice of the system breaks down; the extensive obtainability of image intensifiers means you’re never too far from a C-Arm Machine Suppliers who can deliver you the part you’re looking for.
The other side of that coin, though, is that while parts may be cooler to find, the need for those parts is superior on an image intensifier because of dilapidation ensuing from discriminating radiation dose and other issues. An image intensifier just has more portions that will likely need a package. That’s difficult when you have a high capacity or a diversity of complex procedures.
The package on a flat panel detector can be more intricate than on an image intensifier, which seems like a drawback, but the point is moot if you opt to trust an Original Equipment Manufacturer-certified service provider.
Scope
This contrast is short (factually) and sweet. A flat panel detector is briefer than the image intensifier because, well, it’s a flat panel rather than an encompassed tube structure.
From an ease standpoint, this leaves more room for your team members to circumnavigate because you’re ahead of space between the patient and the technology. This is a sure positive whenever you’re working on larger patients, as it allows you to uphold precise control without forgoing ergonomic sensibility.
If, though, you’re conducting humbler cases such as pain administration rather than more intricate procedures necessitating precise movements and measurements, the scope of the machine may not be a deciding factor.
Image Quality
There are two parts where flat panel technology wins out over image intensifiers: field of interpretation and exactness imaging.
Let’s start with the field of opinion. The flat screen delivers a wide image that permits you to cover varied swaths of the patient’s functional structure as needed. The telescope can deliver a fantastic image too, but you have to point it precisely or pull it back adequately far to get the image you need within the viewer.
There’s also an alteration when imaging smaller constructions of the patient’s body. Flat panel detectors have a higher dissimilarity resolution than image intensifiers, with the further benefit of additional grayscale. These two things syndicate to deliver precise views of functional structures that might appear out of focus consuming an image intensifier, especially if the latter system has been in command for a few years and already skilled significant exhaustion.
Price
An image intensifier will most probably be the lower-cost choice in contrast with flat panel technology. The flat panel is fresher, while image intensifiers have been around since the 1950s (a witness to both their permanency and their somewhat outdated technological foundation). Plus, flat panel detectors, as labeled above, tend to have better image quality thanks to the field of view and exactness imaging capabilities, and their development reflects the more fresh evolution of technology.
When it comes to price, image intensifiers will almost always price less than flat panel detector technology. Though, that price doesn’t necessarily take into account the necessity for service (image intensifiers may know increased stoppage due to degradation and the necessity for parts replacement) or the fact that the technology that needs flat panel detectors has ripened and become more readily available every year. As more choices have been presented, the price of many flat panel detectors has come down considerably compared to even just a couple of years ago.
0
