https://www.medlegal360.com/cartiva-implant-lawsuit/
In propulsion and stress absorption, the “big” toe plays a significant role. Your big toe needs to be healthy and in good condition whether you're running or walking. Your body's equilibrium is preserved by it. The big toe can experience arthritis just like any other part of the body, and until recently, toe fusion surgery was the only treatment option that many doctors could offer. The fusion causes the joint to become stiff and reduces mobility.
A great solution was made possible by the development of the Cartiva toe implant, which allowed for joint movement. However, as soon as this implant was used, doctors and patients began seeing implant failure and other toe issues. Lawsuits involving Cartiva implants were the consequence. The advantages and disadvantages of Cartiva implants are discussed in this article, along with the development and present state of Cartiva big toe joint implant lawsuits.
The big toe can travel on a solid, low-friction surface provided by the Cartiva synthetic cartilage implant, which is a tiny cylindrical gel-like plug inserted between the two sides of the arthritic joint. A part of the damaged cartilage in the toe joint is replaced with a synthetic material that resembles real cartilage in some ways.
In 2015, this innovative brainchild manufactured by Cartiva, Inc., came as an alternative to toe fusion surgery and got the FDA approval in 2016. Cartiva was acquired by Wright Medical Group in 2018 and Wright Medical was acquired by Stryker in 2020.
Since the Cartiva implant had a smooth surface, it was alleged to slip out of place, shrink in size due to dehydration and subsidence. Even the people, like Dr. Bavarian, who supported the product, later discovered its faulty design-related issues.
The patient will not benefit all that much from a joint replacement procedure after the faulty implant has been removed. A portion of the bone must be removed for a joint replacement. The big toe will become shorter than the other toes as a result of this reduction in length. The balance of the body is impacted by short large toes.
Up until the year 2022, about 5 Cartiva implant lawsuits had been submitted. One of them was the case involving Ms. Atkinson. Cathy Atkinson, Gabriel Gesmer, Sally Peterson, Gina Neil, and Tammie Thompson are the plaintiffs. Other than Atkinson's case, all four claims were said to have been settled out of court. There is no recall until now despite the complications and lawsuits.
The producers were held accountable for creating a defective device and keeping the medical community in the dark about the flaws in favor of profit. If you or a loved one has been impacted by a Cartiva implant failure, get in touch with an accomplished Cartiva lawsuit lawyer to handle your claim. Seeking the help of expert witnesses will strengthen your claim.
LezDo TechMed has a long history of providing fact-based medical record evaluations to support product liability claims. They will quickly identify the advantages and disadvantages of your claim after you upload your supporting documentation to them.
0
