1. Addiction

HIV Litigation Attorneys File TDF Lawsuit Against Gilead Sciences2

Disclaimer: This is a user generated content submitted by a member of the WriteUpCafe Community. The views and writings here reflect that of the author and not of WriteUpCafe. If you have any complaints regarding this post kindly report it to us.

The TDF lawsuit focuses on the drug TDF, which is used to treat HIV and as part of the HIV prevention strategy, known as PrEP. However, the drug causes serious and often fatal bone damage to patients. The lawsuit has been filed as Gilead Sciences TDF Lawsuit. The lawsuit is being funded by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation. However, the foundation will not receive any financial recovery from this lawsuit. There are other plaintiffs' firms filing similar lawsuits against Gilead. The HIV Litigation Attorneys have also been at the forefront of the legal battle.

Patients on Gilead's TDF drug have allegedly been diagnosed with kidney disease

Patients taking Gilead Sciences' TDF drug may be at risk for kidney problems, bone loss, and other side effects. These side effects may not manifest for years and can cause permanent damage. However, patients who use TDF are not the only ones at risk. In fact, the drug has caused kidney problems in about 20,000 people.

The adverse effects of Gilead’s TDF Drugs can be severe, affecting the kidneys and bones and compromising the liver. Patients can develop acute renal failure, tubular dysfunction, or chronic kidney disease. In severe cases, patients may even develop Fanconi syndrome. If left untreated, these symptoms may lead to lifelong dialysis or kidney transplant.

The company was well aware of the risks of TDF drugs, but failed to warn doctors or patients of them. As a result, patients have reported kidney injuries, bone damage, and lactic acidosis. The lawsuits against Gilead allege that Gilead hid this risk by understating the risks of the drug.

Patients on Gilead Sciences' TDM drug have allegedly been diagnosed with kidney disease. A kidney failure diagnosis is made after a urine test. The presence of protein in urine is a strong sign of kidney damage. Following this diagnosis, the patient is typically sent for follow-up tests, including ultrasounds.

Patients on Gilead Sciences' TDM drug, Truvada, have begun filing lawsuits after they were diagnosed with kidney disease. The FDA has found that TDF can cause serious side effects for patients. The company should be made aware of this danger to patients before selling the drug.

There are currently more than 22,000 lawsuits filed against Gilead Sciences for TDF-related complications. The lawsuits have been consolidated in California state court. A single judge will hear the cases in San Francisco Superior Court, which should help expedite the process. In addition to these lawsuits, a handful of bellwether trials have been scheduled. The first bellwether trial is expected to begin in July 2022.

The drug is commonly prescribed for individuals with HIV or AIDS and is also a popular treatment for drug users who engage in high-risk sexual activity. Gilead Sciences, the company that manufactures TDF, failed to warn patients about the risks of this drug and failed to provide them with an effective alternative.

Patients on Gilead's TDF drug have allegedly been diagnosed with bone injuries

While TDF is an HIV antiviral drug, it also has serious side effects, including bone, kidney and liver damage. These side effects should be carefully considered, and patients on this drug should discuss them with their doctor. The drug is manufactured by Gilead Sciences, a biotech company based in Foster City, California. The company has been developing TDF medications since 2003 and approved them in 2012.

There have been numerous lawsuits filed against Gilead Sciences relating to the use of TDF. Some of the most common claims relate to the drug's toxicity. While TDF can cause bone injuries, there is no reliable way to determine whether it is safe or not. Patients on the drug have been reported with bone injuries, osteopenia, and avascular necrosis. The manufacturer knew about these risks for years and failed to develop a safer alternative.

The lawsuits involving Gilead Sciences' TDF drug are not the first to arise from this drug. While the company knew about the risks associated with TDF, it failed to properly warn patients about the dangers. However, Gilead was still able to patent TDF, meaning the company could have developed a safe alternative.

The TDF drug is part of a class of drugs known as NRTIs, which block HIV's enzyme and prevent it from dividing. The drug is not a cure but can help a person live longer and feel healthier. Although the drugs may reduce the risk of HIV infection, the side effects of TDF can have lifelong consequences, including bone injury.

TDF drugs can damage bone cells, leading to brittle and porous bones. Patients may also experience liver damage due to the drug, known as lactic acidosis. This condition renders the liver incapable of rebalancing pH levels and is also associated with muscle damage.

In addition to these side effects, Gilead Sciences has intentionally delayed the release of a less toxic version of its HIV drug TDF. TDF was patented by Gilead until 2017, when it made $11 billion in sales. This delay is a result of Gilead delaying the release of TAF, which was designed to help patients on the TDF drug.

Gilead knew it had a safer version of the drug in 2000

The FDA issued warning letters to Gilead Sciences in the early 2000s, but the company ignored them and kept selling TDF, despite the risks. In the meantime, hundreds of thousands of HIV patients were at risk of fatal kidney failure. A few years later, the company presented a safer version of TDF to the FDA, but it chose to delay its release until the TDF patent ran out.

The lawsuit claims that Gilead intentionally marketed and failed to warn patients of the risk of developing kidney and bone damage caused by TDF. It also alleges that Gilead knew it had a safer version, but chose to ignore the evidence because it wanted to protect its bottom line and its shareholders. Gilead has denied these claims and filed a motion for dismissal. However, the judge rejected the motion.

The FDA notified Gilead Sciences of the risks of TDF in 2000, but the company failed to warn the public about these risks. The drug caused kidney failure, lactic acidosis, and bone damage in patients. It is currently under fire from thousands of patients who took the drug.

In addition to the FDA-imposed warnings, Gilead knew the drug was toxic and had a high risk of causing bone and kidney damage. Even before the drug was released in the market, Gilead had already developed five new formulations. Some of these drugs have side effects that include liver and kidney damage, lactic acidosis, bone loss, and fatigue.

However, Gilead chose to stick with the branded version of TDF, TAF. While TDF was effective at slowing the progression of HIV, TAF was much safer. Gilead's decision to keep selling TDF despite the risks involved was a mistake.

The company's new TDF drugs were approved by the FDA in 2001. Since then, the company has been manufacturing a safer version of TDF. The first version was called Viread. It stopped the progression of AIDS and changed the outlook of many HIV patients. Millions of people now use these drugs daily.

Gilead allegedly withheld approval of the safer version of the drug to boost profits at the expense of patient health

Gilead Sciences allegedly withheld the safer version of TDF from the FDA in order to maximize its profits, according to a lawsuit filed by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation. Gilead has denied the allegations, saying that they were trying to protect their intellectual property. However, the AIDS Healthcare Foundation is funding the lawsuit, and will not receive any financial recovery. In addition to the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, several other plaintiffs' firms have filed similar lawsuits against Gilead.

Despite the dangers of TDF, Gilead never discontinued the TAF program and patented seven patents for the drug. The company also continued to downplay the risks associated with TDF. In fact, a 2004 patent filing shows that Gilead failed to disclose the risks associated with TDF.

Even though Gilead knew of the risks associated with TDF, it did not disclose them to the FDA. Instead, they chose to hide the risks from the public by failing to disclose them on the label. This means that patients may make poor decisions about their treatment and put their lives at risk.

As a result, the company continued to delay the release of the safer version of TDF until the patents for Viread and Truvada expired, delaying the release of the drug for eight years. These delayed releases led to many serious side effects for patients. Some of these side effects could have life-changing consequences. These include kidney failure and bone injuries, and even lactic acidosis.

Despite the alleged risks associated with the TDF drug, it has been the most popular HIV treatment in the world. The lawsuit claims that Gilead concealed the risks associated with TDF to make the drug the number one HIV medicine in the world.

During the development of TDF, Gilead delayed the introduction of a safer version of TDF because of the risks involved with the use of the drug. The risks associated with the TDF-based HIV drugs were very high, and patients were at risk of bone fractures, kidney damage, and lactic acidosis, which can be fatal. As a result, Gilead's delayed introduction of a safer TDF-based HIV drug was seen as a way to increase profits at the expense of patient health.



Welcome to WriteUpCafe Community

Join our community to engage with fellow bloggers and increase the visibility of your blog.
Join WriteUpCafe