To understand the differences between Microsoft Azure and Amazon EC2, you must first understand the fundamentals of cloud computing. Cloud computing entails storing files on an Internet server rather than on a computer's hard drive. The files can be accessed from anywhere a computer is used because they do not need to be stored on a server within the users' office and explained in azure certification.
Because many businesses store large amounts of information on computers, memory is critical. Cloud computing eliminates the need to install dedicated software on a computer, lowering the amount of memory required. Microsoft Azure cloud computing provides a virtual server for software loading. It is manageable.
It can be accessed and managed using a Web browser. This type of cloud computing is referred to as platform as a service.
Amazon EC2 uses infrastructure as a service, as opposed to Microsoft Azure cloud computing. This includes clusters, grids, or virtual servers, as well as storage, systems, software, and networks that function as data centers. Both Amazon EC2 and Azure market applications through independent software vendors, or "ISVs." The distinction is that EC2 supports enterprise applications, whereas Azure supports work-group-sized user groups.
Microsoft Azure is thought to be more approachable to developers who are already familiar with.NET and Visual Studio. Although this is easier for Windows developers to use, the number of applications that can be ported is limited. Amazon EC2 supports Windows and Mac.
Both Amazon EC2 and Microsoft Azure cloud computing technologies enable the expansion of virtual machines (VMs) used for applications in terms of both number and power. Azure uses a pay-as-you-go model for the number of virtual machines required for the application, which can be changed via a management console. Elastic Compute Units (ECUs) are used by EC2, which include storage or elastic block stores (EBS) and Amazon Machine Images. Performance is comparable to 32- or 64-bit processors.
Some users claim that the EC2 is more expensive, but it can be economically beneficial for small projects. However, there have been some complaints about Azure's price. With a few exceptions, the costs are actually comparable. Microsoft Azure only provides pricing per database.
0