1. Health

SoClean Lawsuit: Breakthrough Insights Revealed

Disclaimer: This is a user generated content submitted by a member of the WriteUpCafe Community. The views and writings here reflect that of the author and not of WriteUpCafe. If you have any complaints regarding this post kindly report it to us.


In the pursuit of hygiene and cleanliness, SoClean CPAP cleaners emerged as a beacon for device sanitation. Leveraging the powerful attributes of ozone gas, these cleaners were touted as groundbreaking.

However, the very same ozone has been at the epicenter of grave health and ethical concerns. In this article, we delve into the contradictions, risks, and legal battles that have enveloped the SoClean brand, bringing a detailed perspective on the subject.

The Underlying Technology – Ozone Gas

Ozone, a potent cleaning agent, is known for its ability to sanitize and disinfect. However, this very efficacy has turned into a double-edged sword when it comes to SoClean CPAP cleaners.

The application of ozone contradicts its cleansing role in certain contexts:

  • Respiratory Risks: Prolonged exposure may lead to severe respiratory complications.
  • Neurological Impact: Studies have linked ozone with potential neurological damage.
  • Cancer Threat: The carcinogenic potential of ozone raises grave concerns.

Regulatory Warnings and Recall Actions

The FDA has warned against the use of ozone-based CPAP cleaning devices, citing their inherent dangers and the unapproved marketing techniques employed.

The recall of Philips' devices linked to SoClean questioned the safety and ozone levels, further escalating the apprehensions around these cleaners.

Lawsuits and Legal Challenges

The SoClean lawsuits alleged deceptive marketing practices and harmful ozone emissions, challenging SoClean's safety. The allegations surrounding SoClean's utilization of unsafe ozone levels reflect broader concerns about product marketing, regulation, and consumer trust.

Class action lawsuits such as Sakalarios' and Vernon's addressed misleading information and the dangers associated with ozone emissions. The cases were consolidated into MDL No. 3021 in 2022, with a total of 41 pending cases by August 2023, underscoring the gravity of the legal actions.

The manufacturer asserts that the potentially hazardous “activated oxygen” generated during the cleaning process is converted back into regular oxygen through a special filter. However, the accuracy of this assertion has been challenged, as the emitted ozone levels appear to exceed what is deemed safe for human exposure.

Joining the SoClean lawsuit is a process that involves medical consultation, legal assistance, and a comprehensive medical record review. LezDo TechMed stands as a crucial ally in the lawsuit, offering services such as medical chronology, narrative summary, deposition summary, and medical opinion.

Conclusion: A Call for Safety and Ethical Practices

The SoClean saga underscores the importance of safety, ethics, and transparency. It calls for a critical reassessment of the technologies we embrace, underscoring the need for a balance between innovation and caution. The legal battles serve as a reminder that compliance, integrity, and due diligence are non-negotiable in the pursuit of progress and public well-being.


Welcome to WriteUpCafe Community

Join our community to engage with fellow bloggers and increase the visibility of your blog.
Join WriteUpCafe