A grandmother sitting at her daughter's kitchen table in Virginia Beach heard the word Medicaid and put her cup down. She wanted to know whether the family was in trouble, whether this goes on a record somewhere, and whether her grandson would get a lesser therapist than a private plan would buy. None of that came from unkindness. It came from an idea of Medicaid formed in about 1985.
Most parents arranging funded services end up having this conversation more than once, with a parent, a spouse, an ex-partner or a sibling who means well. It goes better when the family member asking has something concrete to hold onto rather than reassurance.
What Medicaid funded therapy actually is here
In Virginia, Medicaid is administered through the Department of Medical Assistance Services, and behavioral therapy for children is a covered benefit rather than a special arrangement. Federal rules require states to cover medically necessary services for enrolled children, which is the mechanism that puts behavior analysis on the list at all. Official programme information is published at dmas.virginia.gov.
What that means in practice is a process rather than a switch. There is a diagnosis, a referral, an assessment by a behavior analyst, and a treatment plan submitted for review, with a decision made against medical necessity criteria and reviewed again at intervals. Nobody can promise in advance what a reviewer will authorise, and any provider who does is telling you something about themselves.
The therapists are the same people. Certification requirements do not vary by funding source, and a behavior analyst working with a Medicaid enrolled child holds the same credential as one working with a commercial plan.
The conversations that go sideways
Three objections come up repeatedly. The first is that the child does not seem to need it, usually from a relative who sees him for four hours at Christmas when everyone is on best behaviour. The useful response is not an argument but a specific example from an ordinary Tuesday.
The second is a worry that therapy will change the child into somebody else, or that the aim is to hide his autism. That deserves a plain answer, because it is not what the work is. Behavior programs teach communication, self-help, play, imitation and safety skills, and reduce behaviors like self-injury by teaching something that works better in their place. A diagnosis is not something therapy removes.
The third is money, and it is usually where the conversation actually was. Families choosing Advanceable ABA of Virginia or any provider can ask for the benefit and authorisation process to be explained once in front of whoever is worried, which tends to end the topic faster than repeating it second hand.
The people who will be in the house
In-home services mean somebody arrives at your address several times a week, and the relatives who visit most will meet them. Decide early what you want from those relatives. Some can be trained on two or three strategies and become genuinely useful. Some cannot, and the honest position is that they get to enjoy the child rather than run the plan.
Say something to the siblings too. Children read a stranger's regular presence as significant and will construct an explanation whether or not one is offered, and the explanation they invent is usually worse than the truth.
The conversation nobody prepares for is the one at year two, when a relative who was sceptical wants to know why therapy is still going on if it worked. That one is easier if you have been showing them the small milestones all along, the shoes, the request for help, the first restaurant meal that finished, rather than saving the news for the moments that sound impressive.
Sign in to leave a comment.