Someone gave you a bigger title, maybe a team, and mostly left you to figure it out. No follow-up lesson on how to actually lead people. No one is pulling you aside two years in to check whether the culture forming under you is healthy or quietly corroding. You just kept managing the way you'd watched other people manage and assumed it was working because nobody said otherwise.
A surprising number of leaders are still running on the exact instincts they picked up in their first management job. Reacting instead of developing. Rewarding the loud win and missing the slow drift. It's not that people don't care about their teams — it's that leadership is one of the few high-stakes jobs where almost nobody circles back to correct you. This is the gap that organizational and leadership consultants like LaTonya Applewhite tend to work in: not handing you a personality, but giving you the outside read that your day-to-day simply doesn't provide.
The Leadership Mistakes Almost Everyone Makes
None of these are dramatic. They're small habits, repeated for years, that quietly stack up.
- Confusing being busy and available with actually developing the people under you
- Rewarding output while ignoring the culture forming underneath it
- Putting off hard feedback conversations until they turn into exit interviews
- Assuming talent will develop itself, with no real path for anyone to grow into
- Leaning on the same two or three strong performers until they burn out and leave
None of this shows up next quarter. It shows up years down the line as turnover, disengagement, or the same capable people walking out the door for reasons no one can quite name. By then the habit has usually been running on autopilot so long that the leader doing it has no clue anything's off. It just feels like managing, because it's the only version they've ever known.
Why Does Nobody Ever Point This Out?
The people best positioned to tell you — your direct reports — are also the people with the most to lose by being honest. Peers are busy with their own teams. The board mostly looks at numbers, which lag the culture by a year or more. So there's rarely anyone in the room whose actual job is to watch how you lead and say something before a specific problem forces the conversation.
That's really the gap here. Not a knowledge problem so much as a feedback problem. Nobody's watching in a way that's safe to be honest about, so nothing gets corrected.
How Does an Outside Read Reveal a Blind Spot You Can't See?
An outside perspective doesn't rely on you noticing your own blind spots, because by definition you can't. The value isn't inspiration — it's having someone whose only obligation is to tell you the truth about what's working and what isn't. In practice, working with someone like LaTonya Applewhite tends to look like this:
- An honest read on the culture forming under you, not the one on the values page
- A real structure for developing talent, instead of leaving growth to chance
- Naming the leadership habits you can't see, before they become turnover you can
- A feedback loop your org chart doesn't naturally create on its own
That's really the core difference. Leading on instinct depends on you doing the right thing, every day, for years, with almost no correction along the way. An outside read takes a lot of that guesswork off the table.
Manual Instinct vs. An Outside Read
| Factor | Going It Alone | Working With Someone Like LaTonya Applewhite |
| Blind spots | Invisible to the person who has them, by definition | Named by an outside reader that owes you honesty, not comfort |
| Feedback loop | Almost none—direct reports rarely tell you the truth | Structured, so problems surface before they calcify |
| Talent development | Often left to chance and good intentions | Given an actual path instead of being assumed |
| Culture drift | Noticed only once turnover or disengagement forces it | Checked while it's still cheap to change |
Is This Actually a Big Deal or Just Consulting Talk?
Worth being straight about this one. Unchecked leadership habits really do drive turnover and disengagement over time — the cost of losing and replacing good people is well documented, and "culture" is usually the reason underneath the reason they give. So the underlying problem is real, not something invented to sell a service.
Where it gets more complicated: an outside perspective only helps as much as you're willing to act on it. A consultant can name a blind spot precisely, and nothing changes if the leadership above them isn't ready to move. So the honest version of this isn't "bring in an expert and culture fixes itself." It's that a good outside read removes a specific, narrow category of long-term leadership errors that going it alone has no built-in defense against.
Pro Tip: If no one has ever given you honest feedback on how you lead—not your results, but your leadership—ask for it before something forces the conversation. Whether that read comes from a trusted peer or someone like LaTonya Applewhite, it can catch a habit you've been running since your first management job.
FAQs
Q1: How do I know if I have a leadership blind spot? Steady turnover, feedback that dries up the higher you go, and the same problems resurfacing on your team are the usual signs—by definition, you can't see the habit itself, only its fallout.
Q2: Can unchecked leadership habits actually hurt an organization long-term?
Yes. Years of avoided feedback and drifting culture quietly compound into turnover, disengagement, and lost institutional knowledge, even when the numbers look fine on the surface.
Q3: Does bringing in an outside perspective completely fix leadership problems?
It removes a few major variables—blind spots and missing feedback mainly—but the leadership has to be willing to act on what gets named for it to hold up.
Q4: Why hasn't anyone ever corrected my leadership before?
The people who see it most clearly usually report to you, and honesty upward is risky. Correction tends to arrive only once a problem is already visible.
Q5: Is it too late to fix habits I've had for my whole career?
No. Damage already done to a team won't fully reverse, but changing how you lead going forward still makes a real difference.
Q6: Should newer managers get this kind of help early or wait?
Earlier tends to help — building an honest feedback habit before instincts set in beats trying to unwind years of autopilot later.
Final Verdict
Most leaders were shown the job once, early on, and largely left to run on instinct after that. Years later, they're still repeating the same patterns — some of them genuinely costly — simply because nobody was ever positioned to correct them. That's less a personal failing and more a gap in how leadership gets taught in the first place.
An outside read from someone like LaTonya Applewhite won't fix every organizational issue on its own. But it does address something specific and real: years of leadership habits nobody ever checked. If your culture, your feedback, and your blind spots haven't actually been looked at since you first took charge, that's worth taking seriously—whether the fix ends up being a new habit or a new perspective in the room.
Sign in to leave a comment.