In a recent development that has ignited a fresh wave of discussion in political circles, the Law Commission of India has delved into the possibility of implementing ‘One Nation, One Election‘ (ONOE), a concept that proposes simultaneous elections at various levels of governance. The ongoing deliberations come amidst diverse opinions on the feasibility and implications of this ambitious electoral reform.
Law Commission chairman Rituraj Awasthi, in an exclusive interview with CNN-News18, provided insights into the Election Commission of India's position, emphasizing that the execution of ONOE is conceivable with adequate planning time. The essence of the proposal lies in harmonizing elections for the Lok Sabha, state Assemblies, municipalities, and panchayats, aiming to create a more streamlined and efficient electoral process.
While optimism surrounds the potential benefits of synchronized elections, critics argue that the road to ONOE is fraught with challenges. Former Election Commission official Akshay Rout, acknowledging the difficulties, contends that though the concept is not impossible, its implementation requires meticulous planning and constitutional amendments. Legal experts echo these sentiments, cautioning against underestimating the intricate nature of such a transformative move.
The eight-member high-level committee, chaired by former President Ram Nath Kovind, has been diligently examining the prospect of ONOE. Tasked with recommending amendments to the Constitution and electoral laws, the committee is navigating the complexities associated with this proposal. Constitutional amendments, sources suggest, are likely to be a prerequisite for a seamless and flexible implementation.
A major concern raised by critics revolves around the potential impact on the federal structure of the country. Skeptics argue that the diversity of issues at the state level may be overshadowed by a nationalized electoral discourse. Additionally, the logistical challenges of organizing simultaneous elections across the vast and varied landscape of India pose practical hurdles that cannot be ignored.
On the flip side, supporters of ONOE point to potential advantages such as cost reduction, increased voter participation, and a more informed electorate. The proposal aims to break the cycle of perpetual electioneering, allowing elected representatives to focus on governance without the constant specter of impending polls.
As the Law Commission and the high-level committee continue their discussions, the nation is at a crossroads, considering the implications of ONOE on the democratic fabric of India. The outcome of these deliberations will likely shape the trajectory of electoral reforms in the country, and whether ‘One Nation, One Election' becomes a reality or remains a subject of debate is a question that resonates across political landscapes.
