Somewhere on your phone right now, there is probably a group chat named something like "Multibagger Alerts" or "Intraday Kings." Someone in it just typed a stock name, a target price, and three fire emojis. It feels urgent. It feels like insider access. And statistically, it is very likely to cost you money.
This isn't a moral lecture about greed. It's a structural problem, and the data on it has become impossible to ignore. Every year, a fresh batch of investors joins these groups convinced that this time the tip will be different, that this particular sender actually knows something the rest of the market doesn't. Almost none of them do. What they usually have is a script, a sense of timing, and an audience willing to act on faith instead of numbers.
The Losses Aren't a Blip. They're a Pattern.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India has studied retail trading outcomes in the equity derivatives segment across several reporting periods, and the number barely moves. In FY22, roughly 89 percent of individual traders in the equity F&O segment incurred losses, with an average loss of about ₹1.1 lakh. By FY25, that figure had climbed to around 91 percent, with aggregate net losses widening to roughly ₹1.05 lakh crore, up about 41 percent from the prior year. The most recent SEBI study, covering FY26, found close to 88 percent of retail traders still losing money, with aggregate losses near ₹91,685 crore.
What makes this more revealing isn't the percentage itself. It's who kept losing. SEBI found that among traders who lost money for two straight years and kept trading anyway, about 90 percent lost again the following year. That single detail says more about the psychology of tip-chasing than any survey could. People don't usually walk away after one bad trade. They tell themselves the next tip will be the one that makes it back, and the cycle repeats.
The number of active individual F&O traders actually fell sharply during this period, from 98.1 lakh in FY25 to 78.6 lakh in FY26, a drop of roughly 20 percent, with new entrants down nearly 40 percent. Fewer people were trading. The ones who stayed didn't get meaningfully better results, which suggests the problem was never really inexperience alone. It was the absence of any repeatable process standing between an idea and a trade. Reading a fundamental scoring model that rates a company across growth, profitability, efficiency and valuation before you act on a name at least gives you a number you can question later, something a tip never offers, and something you can track over time to see whether it actually predicted anything.
That is the backdrop against which a "buy this now" message from a stranger lands. It doesn't arrive in a vacuum. It arrives in a market where the base rate of retail success, especially in leveraged, short-horizon trades, is already stacked against the person receiving the tip. Adding urgency and social proof on top of those odds doesn't improve them. It just makes people act faster on a bet that was already unfavourable.
Why the Tip Itself Is Often the Problem, Not Just the Timing
SEBI issued a formal circular in April 2025 warning investors about a rise in fraud and manipulation tied to social media investing groups. The regulator described a recurring pattern: fraudsters impersonate registered advisors, build convincing but fake websites and certificates, and lure people into "VIP" trading clubs on Telegram and WhatsApp using fabricated screenshots of past profits. Once trust is established, the tip itself often follows a pump and dump structure. Buy a thinly traded stock quietly, promote it heavily to a large group, and exit once enough new buyers have pushed the price up.
This isn't a fringe phenomenon. Exchanges have flagged it publicly for over a decade, and investor guidance from stock exchanges explicitly warns people not to trade on the basis of rumours generally called tips, or to deal with unregistered entities promising unrealistic returns. SEBI has separately gone after unauthorised advisors directly, sending warning letters to around 20 unregistered investment advisors in a single two-month stretch, and has taken enforcement action against Telegram channel operators posing as research analysts to run coordinated pump and dump schemes.
Compare that with what a legitimate research process actually looks like. Reviewing analyst-prepared research reports that walk through earnings call summaries, IPO filings, and sector data before a stock gets recommended is a very different experience from receiving a target price with no reasoning attached. One shows its working. The other asks you to trust a stranger's word over your own judgement, on the basis of nothing but confidence and timing.
The uncomfortable truth is that a tip, by design, asks you to skip the part of investing that actually protects you: understanding why a stock might be worth buying, what its financials look like, and whether the price move is backed by anything real. A tip works precisely because it removes that step. It replaces analysis with urgency, and urgency is much easier to act on than a balance sheet.
What Actually Replaces a Tip
The alternative to "someone told me to buy this" isn't hours of manual spreadsheet work every evening. It's a filtering process, applied consistently, using criteria you actually understand and can defend to yourself later.
This is the entire logic behind organised stock screening, built for investors who have an idea in mind but struggle to find the stocks matching it, whether that idea is "companies with rising promoter holding," "stocks trading near a 52-week high with strong volume," or "fundamentally sound FMCG names." Pre-built scan groups let you apply dozens of these filters at once instead of hunting for tips, which turns stock selection into a repeatable process rather than a one-off bet on a stranger's credibility. You decide the rule. The screener just applies it consistently, every single day, without getting excited or impatient.
The difference matters because a screener doesn't just show you a stock. It shows you why that stock showed up, based on a rule you set or chose. That single distinction, a visible reason versus no reason at all, is the entire gap between research and a rumour. And unlike a tip, a screening rule can be tested. You can look back and see whether stocks meeting a particular filter historically performed better or worse than the broader market, something no WhatsApp forward has ever offered.
None of this guarantees a winning trade. Markets don't work that way, and anyone claiming otherwise is repeating the exact pitch SEBI has been warning investors about. What a structured process does is remove the two things that make tip-based investing so dangerous: the absence of a verifiable reason, and the absence of a way to check your own mistake later. If a stock you screened for underperforms, you can look at the criteria and adjust them. If a stock a stranger told you to buy underperforms, there is nothing to learn from except "don't trust that person again," and by then the money is usually gone.
Building the Habit That Actually Compounds
Retail investors who've been burned by group chat tips often swing to the opposite extreme and stop trusting any external information at all, which isn't the fix either. Good research still draws on sector trends, price momentum and company fundamentals. The difference is where that information comes from and whether you can independently verify it before you act on it.
A curated list of stocks trading near identifiable key levels, with the underlying reasoning and upside or downside levels shown alongside it, is a fundamentally different object from a tip. One invites scrutiny and shows you exactly where the idea could go wrong. The other depends on you not scrutinising it at all, and rarely mentions a downside case in the first place.
But even a well-reasoned individual stock idea sits inside a larger picture that a single tip never accounts for. A tip treats every stock as an isolated bet, disconnected from what the broader market or its sector is actually doing that week. That's a meaningful blind spot, because the same stock can behave very differently depending on whether the money in its sector is flowing in or flowing out.
For investors who want that missing macro context, tracking sector rotation and market breadth shows which parts of the market are actually gaining strength, instead of asking you to take one anonymous message's word for it. A stock recommended in a sector that's losing momentum carries a very different risk profile than the same stock recommended in a sector that's gaining it, and that context is exactly what a tip never includes. It's the difference between buying into a current and buying against one, and most people chasing tips have no idea which one they're doing.
None of this requires giving up on finding good ideas quickly. It requires building the habit of asking "based on what data, exactly" before you ask "how much can I make?" SEBI's own numbers suggest that most people currently asking the second question first are losing money doing it, year after year, regardless of how many new entrants join the market or how many eventually leave it.
If you're serious about learning the reasoning behind stock selection rather than chasing signals, spending time on structured, self-paced market education tends to close that gap faster than any tip ever will, because it teaches you to evaluate the next tip yourself instead of depending on someone else's word for it. That's really the whole shift in one sentence: from being the person who receives a signal to being the person who can judge whether a signal deserves any attention at all.
The next time a message lands in a group chat promising a stock is about to move, the useful question isn't "should I buy this." It's "would I still buy this if the message came with the actual numbers instead of a target price." Most of the time, once you go looking for those numbers yourself, the tip quietly stops mattering, and that shift, from reacting to messages to running your own filters, is usually where the losses in these statistics start to stop compounding against you.
This article is for general information and educational purposes and does not constitute investment advice. Always verify the SEBI registration of anyone offering investment recommendations before acting on them.
Sign in to leave a comment.