While Mercy is billed as a high-tech thriller exploring A.I.’s role in human life, it functions more as a “screenlife” experience, where the majority of the film centers on a character navigating computer screens and accessing surveillance cameras. Screenwriter Marco van Belle presents a premise with promise: a man accused of murder is thrust into an A.I.-driven courtroom, given 90 minutes to defend his innocence before a digital judge. The near-future setting—Los Angeles, 2029—is rich with possibilities, yet director Timur Bekmambetov (Profile, 2021) opts for a B-movie approach, prioritizing cheap thrills over logic or character depth. The novelty of watching Chris Pratt explore a citywide surveillance system wears thin fast, leaving the story feeling repetitive.
In this world, the justice system has been replaced by the Mercy Courts, an A.I.-operated judicial framework that judges cases via biometric data and digital evidence. Detective Chris Raven (Chris Pratt) wakes up restrained in a chair and soon meets Judge Maddox (Rebecca Ferguson), who informs him that he has 90 minutes to prove he didn’t murder his estranged wife, Nicole (Annabelle Wallis). Chris scrambles to clear his foggy mind after a drunken bender, reaching out to his AA sponsor Rob (Chris Sullivan), his daughter Britt (Kylie Rogers), and his LAPD partner Jaq (Kali Reis) for help. Armed with the Mercy Court’s surveillance access, Chris pieces together clues while racing against the ticking “guilt percentage” that could trigger his immediate execution.
Bekmambetov’s focus is firmly on Chris, rather than the complex world he inhabits. Pratt, who co-created the A.I. judicial system, is largely confined to a chair, delivering flat line readings that fail to convey the urgency of the situation. Instead of nail-biting tension, much of the film amounts to watching Pratt scroll through digital feeds while the audience waits for some spark of drama.
The Mercy Court allows Chris near-unlimited access to the city’s cameras—body cams, doorbell cams, security feeds, and drones—creating a supposedly dynamic environment. In practice, the screenlife sequences feel repetitive, and Bekmambetov quickly pivots to full-blown action. Chris chases suspects atop rooftops, zips through streets on a hoverbike, and coordinates frantic searches with Jaq, yet the film’s “mystery” takes a backseat. The identity of Nicole’s killer is telegraphed early, and the writing never gives viewers a reason to doubt the obvious, leaving the tension hollow.
The final act abandons the screenlife conceit entirely in favor of gunfights, car chases, and ticking-clock spectacle. While Bekmambetov’s signature flair for visual set pieces is present, the story fails to justify the action. The A.I.-driven world is never fully explained, and the narrative logic frequently collapses under its own weight.
For those browsing sci-fi thrillers or hunting for Flixtor full movies, Mercy is an example of high-concept material executed without depth. The premise of an A.I. court is intriguing, the surveillance-tech ideas are timely, but the performances and plotting leave much to be desired. By the end, the film is less a suspenseful thriller and more a hollow exercise in action spectacle.
Sign in to leave a comment.